The March on Rome, conducted between October 27 and 30, 1922, was not simply a symbolic parade of black-clad men demanding power. It was the culmination of years of ideological agitation, strategic manipulation, systemic erosion of democratic institutions, and calculated violence. To understand it in full, one must delve into the intricate web of political decay, social unrest, elite complicity, and royal acquiescence that allowed a relatively small movement to seize the helm of an entire nation and inaugurate a twenty-year dictatorship.
At the end of World War I, Italy was left not with triumph but with turmoil. Though it emerged on the victorious side of the war, Italians regarded the Treaty of Saint-Germain as a betrayal. The term vittoria mutilata, or "mutilated victory," gained currency to describe their disillusionment with the territorial rewards granted.
Nationalists felt Italy’s sacrifices had not been honored. Meanwhile, the domestic situation was marked by economic collapse, soaring inflation, mass unemployment, and widespread labor strikes. Socialists and anarchists led factory occupations and agrarian uprisings in what came to be known as the Biennio Rosso, the “Two Red Years” of 1919–1920. For Italy’s middle class, landowners, and industrialists, the specter of Bolshevism loomed large. Liberal governments proved incapable of stemming the chaos or quelling the fears of a communist revolution.
Into this volatile environment stepped Benito Mussolini, a former socialist who had broken with the left over his support for the war. In 1919, he founded the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento, which later evolved into the National Fascist Party. The movement promised order, national rejuvenation, and an alternative to both socialism and the stagnant liberal regime.
Fascism fused ultranationalism with anti-communism, veneration of the state, militarism, and the glorification of violence as a political tool. Through the formation of paramilitary squads known as the Blackshirts (Squadristi), Mussolini’s movement gained notoriety for breaking strikes, destroying socialist offices, and beating or murdering political opponents.
These squads operated with increasing impunity as the authorities often turned a blind eye. Some local police and army units quietly cooperated with the Fascists, while many landowners and businessmen financially supported them, viewing them as a necessary bulwark against socialist revolution
. Between 1920 and 1922, the Fascists expanded their influence, especially in rural areas of northern and central Italy, where they systematically dismantled socialist organizations through a mix of propaganda and terror. Fascist squads conducted punitive expeditions, humiliating mayors, trade unionists, and activists, forcing resignations and burning buildings.
In this context, the Fascists began plotting their seizure of national power. The decision to march on Rome was not spontaneous but calculated. The plan was crafted by Mussolini and four key lieutenants, known as the Quadrumvirs: Italo Balbo, Emilio De Bono, Michele Bianchi, and Cesare Maria De Vecchi. These men were chosen for their organizational skills and regional authority over fascist militias. At the Fascist Party Congress held in Naples on October 24, 1922, Mussolini addressed a crowd of tens of thousands, delivering a rousing speech in which he stated unequivocally that the time had come to govern Italy. The Fascists, he declared, would either be given power or take it by force.
The logistics of the March were coordinated with military precision. Fascist columns were organized to approach the capital from several directions north, northeast, and southeast. Their goal was to occupy key infrastructure points such as train stations, telegraph lines, and regional government offices, thereby crippling any coordinated resistance.
Fascist leaders also intended to create a sense of inevitability, projecting the image of a vast, unified uprising when, in reality, many of the “marchers” were transported by train or truck. It was less a military invasion than a psychological campaign designed to overwhelm a fragmented government and an indecisive monarchy.
By October 27, an estimated 30,000 Blackshirts had gathered around Rome. Inside the city, Prime Minister Luigi Facta moved to declare a state of siege, which would have allowed the army to repel the Fascists. But when presented with the decree, King Victor Emmanuel III refused to sign it.
His reasons remain a subject of historical debate. Some argue he feared a civil war that the army might not win; others contend he sought to preserve the monarchy by allying with the growing fascist force. Perhaps most plausibly, the king believed Mussolini could restore order and suppress the socialists without threatening the crown.
Facta, finding himself politically isolated and powerless, tendered his resignation. The king, acting within his constitutional authority, invited Mussolini to form a government. At the time, Mussolini was still in Milan. He received the royal telegram on October 29 and arrived in Rome the next day, traveling by night train in an atmosphere of triumph. On October 31, he was officially sworn in as Prime Minister. That same day, the Blackshirts staged a ceremonial parade through the capital, designed to suggest a glorious conquest. In reality, Mussolini’s rise was facilitated not by overwhelming force, but by the elite’s capitulation, the monarchy’s failure to defend democracy, and the effective use of propaganda and intimidation.
The March on Rome was thus not a traditional revolution or coup d'état but a hybrid seizure of power part legal transition, part intimidation campaign. The liberal state, riddled with divisions and weakened by years of crisis, had no stomach to resist. The event was retroactively mythologized by the Fascist regime as the moment of national rebirth, a founding episode in the Fascist calendar that was to be commemorated annually. But at the time, many Italians regarded it with confusion or fear, unsure whether it marked stability or the start of something darker.
Once in power, Mussolini wasted no time consolidating control. He secured emergency powers from parliament in November 1922, ostensibly to restore order. Over the next three years, he dismantled the constitutional framework of the liberal state. Opposition parties were harassed, censored, or dissolved. Fascist squads were absorbed into the state apparatus as the Milizia Volontaria per la Sicurezza Nazionale (MVSN), institutionalizing political violence under a legal guise. The press was muzzled, trade unions were suppressed, and a cult of personality around Mussolini began to emerge. By 1925, Mussolini declared himself Il Duce, signaling the beginning of a full-fledged dictatorship.
The legacy of the March on Rome is complex. On one hand, it demonstrated the vulnerability of liberal democracies in times of crisis, especially when elites believe they can manage or manipulate authoritarian forces for their own ends. The king thought he could control Mussolini. The industrialists believed fascism would protect their interests. Both were disastrously wrong. On the other hand, the March became a prototype for other authoritarian movements across Europe. Adolf Hitler, for example, would attempt his own version in 1923 with the Beer Hall Putsch, inspired in part by Mussolini’s success.
Far from being a singular event, the March was the climax of a broader campaign of fascist penetration into Italian society. From 1919 to 1922, the Fascists had built a parallel power structure, one that coexisted with and gradually undermined the liberal state. Through paramilitary violence, populist rhetoric, and opportunistic alliances with conservative institutions, Mussolini built a bridge between the margins and the center of power. The march was not the beginning of fascist rule; it was its inevitable culmination.
Moreover, the March on Rome must be understood not only as a political and military maneuver but as a psychological one. Mussolini and his allies excelled in theatricality. The black uniforms, the Roman salutes, the evocative symbols all were crafted to appeal to a public yearning for strength and order. In an age of radio and newspapers, image became a weapon as potent as any gun. The Fascists created a myth of their own inevitability, and many Italians, weary from years of instability, accepted it.
The consequences of the March were catastrophic in the long term. Italy was transformed into a one-party state. Dissent was crushed. The judiciary and civil service were purged and politicized. Education was brought under state control. Italy entered a path that would ultimately lead to colonial aggression in Africa, alliance with Nazi Germany, participation in World War II, and national ruin. Mussolini’s regime, born in a moment of elite accommodation and public exhaustion, would end in ignominy with his execution in 1945.
Yet the March on Rome continues to resonate in the study of modern authoritarianism. It reveals how fragile democratic systems can be when institutional guardians fail to act, when fear overtakes principle, and when violence is rewarded rather than punished. It also underscores the importance of narrative in political power. By transforming a logistical maneuver into a founding legend, the Fascists created a myth that legitimized their rule, at least for a time.
In sum, the March on Rome stands not only as a key episode in Italian history but as a warning to all democracies. The collapse of liberty did not come through tanks or foreign invasion. It came from within through legal appointments, royal decrees, and public indifference. It came with slogans, uniforms, and songs, cloaked in the language of renewal and order. What followed was not the rejuvenation of Italy but its descent into darkness. The events of October 1922 thus serve as a stark reminder that democracy, once abandoned, is not easily recovered.
No comments:
Post a Comment