Pages

Thursday, October 2, 2025

The Second Italo-Ethiopian War: Empire, Resistance, and the Failure of Peace

 In the early 20th century, amid the tremors of shifting empires and the ideological aftershocks of the Great War, a colonial conflict erupted that would not only signal the fragility of international institutions but also become a potent symbol of African resistance. The Second Italo-Ethiopian War, fought between October 1935 and May 1936, was far more than a regional confrontation.It was a clash between imperial ambition and sovereign defiance, a prelude to global war, and a stark revelation of the impotence of collective security when confronted by fascist expansionism. This article explores the full arc of the war, its causes, campaigns, atrocities, and legacy, through a chronological and thematic analysis of one of the 20th century’s most telling conflicts.

The roots of the Second Italo-Ethiopian War lie not merely in the expansionist policy of Fascist Italy, but in the psychological wound inflicted on Italy nearly four decades earlier. In 1896, the Ethiopian Empire, under Emperor Menelik II, decisively defeated the Italian Army at the Battle of Adwa. The defeat was not only a military failure but a profound humiliation for a European power seeking validation through colonial conquest. Adwa became a symbol of pride for Africans worldwide and a national disgrace for Italy.

By the 1930s, Benito Mussolini’s fascist regime sought to rewrite that legacy. Italy’s ambitions were twofold: restore national pride through revenge and establish a Roman-style African empire stretching from the Mediterranean to the Indian Ocean. Ethiopia, surrounded by Italian Eritrea to the north and Italian Somaliland to the southeast, presented itself as the missing piece in this imperial puzzle.

Economically, the conquest of Ethiopia promised Mussolini a release valve for Italy’s demographic pressures and economic unrest. The fascist state viewed Africa as a realm where surplus Italian populations could be relocated, where new land could be cultivated, and where the military could demonstrate its technological superiority. For Mussolini, Ethiopia was both a symbolic prize and a practical solution to internal dissatisfaction.

Tensions between the two countries had simmered since the 1928 Italo-Ethiopian Treaty, which nominally recognized Ethiopian sovereignty while establishing a fragile diplomatic framework. However, Italy’s infrastructural and military buildup in its East African colonies suggested long-term designs of aggression. When a border incident occurred at the oasis of Wal-Wal in December 1934, it offered Mussolini the provocation he needed.

The skirmish at Wal-Wal involved Ethiopian and Italian colonial troops clashing in a disputed border area, resulting in several dozen casualties. The incident, though localized, became the diplomatic ignition point. Ethiopia appealed to the League of Nations, expecting a neutral investigation. Italy, on the other hand, demanded an apology and reparations. Mussolini had no interest in de-escalation. The confrontation was engineered to legitimize a premeditated war.

As diplomatic protests and legal arguments unfolded at Geneva, Italy continued its military preparations. Massive troop movements, logistical planning, and propaganda campaigns within Italy set the stage for a full-scale invasion. By the autumn of 1935, the path to war was clear, and international resistance was virtually nonexistent. The League of Nations proved hesitant, divided, and ultimately ineffectual, unwilling to antagonize Italy or endanger European stability.

On October 3, 1935, Italy invaded Ethiopia from the north through Eritrea and from the south via Italian Somaliland. The northern front was led by General Emilio De Bono, who launched a slow but methodical campaign, quickly capturing border towns such as Adigrat, Adwa, and Axum. Simultaneously, General Rodolfo Graziani advanced from the Ogaden region, targeting the southern highlands.

Italy's military superiority was staggering. It deployed between 600,000 and 700,000 troops, supported by aircraft, tanks, modern artillery, and vast logistical chains. The Ethiopian army, led by Emperor Haile Selassie, could muster nearly 500,000 men, yet most lacked modern weaponry. Many were peasants armed with spears, swords, or antiquated rifles, often with little or no formal training.

Despite this disparity, Ethiopia was not wholly unprepared. Its mountainous terrain, decentralised warrior traditions, and patriotic fervor provided advantages in asymmetrical warfare. Nevertheless, Italy’s air dominance and use of modern munitions rendered many Ethiopian defenses obsolete.

Mussolini, dissatisfied with De Bono's slow progress, replaced him with Marshal Pietro Badoglio in November 1935. The change signaled a more aggressive approach. Mussolini demanded both speed and spectacle—the conquest of Ethiopia had to be swift and overwhelming to bolster his fascist regime at home and intimidate potential critics abroad.

Despite being outgunned, Ethiopia launched a counter-offensive in late December 1935. Known as the Christmas Offensive, the campaign was a bold attempt to push back Italian forces on multiple fronts. Ethiopian troops, under generals like Ras Kassa and Ras Imru, briefly halted Italian advances and even inflicted losses on some units. Morale surged, and there was momentary hope that Italy’s campaign might falter under logistical strain and Ethiopian resilience.

However, these successes proved unsustainable. Italy quickly regrouped and shifted tactics, launching a devastating aerial bombing campaign and deploying chemical weapons, in blatant violation of international law. The introduction of mustard gas was particularly catastrophic. Sprayed from planes or dropped in bombs, the gas caused agonizing injuries, long-term environmental damage, and immense psychological trauma. Villages were targeted, rivers were poisoned, and entire regions became uninhabitable.

As January 1936 began, Italy launched a new offensive from the north. A series of coordinated assaults overwhelmed Ethiopian positions in Tembien, Amba Aradam, and eventually Maychew—the last major battle before the capital fell. The technological gap between the two sides had become insurmountable.

By late March 1936, Badoglio prepared for the final thrust toward Addis Ababa. The March of the Iron Will, a highly publicized advance through the central highlands, was both a military maneuver and a psychological operation. Italian troops covered more than 300 kilometers in just over a week, encountering minimal resistance as Ethiopian forces disintegrated under pressure.

On May 5, 1936, Italian forces entered Addis Ababa. Emperor Haile Selassie, refusing to surrender or die in exile, chose temporary flight. He embarked on a journey to Europe to rally support, becoming a voice of moral authority in exile. In his absence, Mussolini declared victory, annexed Ethiopia, and proclaimed the birth of Italian East Africa. King Victor Emmanuel III was crowned Emperor of Ethiopia, and Badoglio was appointed viceroy.

Italy’s formal occupation did not translate into full control. While Addis Ababa and other urban centers fell under fascist administration, the countryside remained volatile. Ethiopian patriots, known as the Arbegnoch or “patriots,” began a protracted guerrilla resistance. Operating from remote mountains and forests, they launched ambushes, assassinations, and sabotage campaigns, often at great personal risk.

Italian authorities responded with unparalleled brutality. After a failed assassination attempt on Marshal Graziani in February 1937, Italy carried out one of the most infamous massacres of the occupation. Over three days, Italian troops and Blackshirt militias conducted a campaign of collective punishment in Addis Ababa, executing thousands of civilians, clergy, and suspected patriots. The massacre, known as Yekatit 12, claimed as many as 20,000 lives roughly a fifth of the city’s population.

Beyond urban massacres, Italy used chemical warfare on a scale unseen in modern times. By war’s end, estimates suggest more than 350 tons of mustard gas had been used. Villagers, livestock, and agricultural systems were destroyed. The Italian occupation operated as a campaign of cultural erasure, executing intellectuals, looting artifacts, and undermining institutions. Churches, monasteries, and historical sites were often targeted as part of a broader effort to obliterate Ethiopian identity.

From the outset, Ethiopia had appealed to the League of Nations. Its status as a member state offered a glimmer of hope for diplomatic intervention. However, the League’s response was tepid. While it condemned Italy’s aggression and imposed limited sanctions, these measures excluded vital resources such as oil and iron. The sanctions were further undermined by countries like Germany and the United States, which were not League members and continued trade.

Britain and France, the leading powers in the League, adopted a policy of appeasement. Eager to avoid alienating Mussolini and potentially pushing him closer to Hitler, they declined to enforce stronger sanctions. Secret negotiations even contemplated granting parts of Ethiopia to Italy in exchange for peace—a betrayal that Haile Selassie decried in his historic 1936 speech at the League of Nations headquarters in Geneva. His impassioned plea for justice became an iconic moment of moral clarity in an age of political compromise.

The League's failure in Ethiopia marked the effective end of its credibility. It became evident that collective security, without enforcement mechanisms, amounted to little more than rhetoric. This weakness emboldened aggressor states and accelerated the descent into global war.

The human cost of the conflict was staggering. Ethiopian fatalities are estimated at over 300,000, including soldiers, civilians, and victims of chemical attacks and reprisals. Italian casualties were far fewer, around 3,600 deaths and 40,000 wounded by 1940. Yet the moral damage inflicted by fascist policies left a deeper wound than the casualty count reveals.

Despite its initial military victory, Italy never fully pacified Ethiopia. Resistance movements endured, and widespread dissatisfaction plagued the colony. The brutality of Italian rule eroded any legitimacy it might have claimed, and the illusion of a civilizing mission collapsed under the weight of atrocities.

In 1940, Italy joined Nazi Germany in World War II. A year later, British Commonwealth forces and Ethiopian patriots launched the East African Campaign. By April 1941, Addis Ababa was liberated, and Haile Selassie triumphantly returned. Italy’s short-lived empire collapsed under the pressure of war, resistance, and international counteroffensives.

The Second Italo-Ethiopian War left a multifaceted legacy. It marked one of the last major colonial conquests before World War II and became a symbol of both the brutality of fascism and the courage of anti-colonial resistance. Ethiopia’s defiance, even in exile, inspired a generation of African nationalists, many of whom viewed Haile Selassie as a prophetic figure and Adwa as a beacon of possibility.

The war also served as a dress rehearsal for global conflict. Italy’s use of chemical weapons, disregard for international law, and the world's failure to intervene echoed in later fascist campaigns in Europe and North Africa. The impotence of the League of Nations in the face of fascist aggression highlighted the need for a more robust system of international governance. This realization would inform the creation of the United Nations, structured with enforcement mechanisms that its predecessor lacked.

In the postwar era, Italy would face no substantial accountability for its actions in Ethiopia. War criminals were neither tried nor punished. The memory of the war was often buried in Italian discourse, while Ethiopia struggled to reclaim artifacts, rebuild institutions, and secure recognition of its suffering.

Yet Ethiopia’s survival and ultimate victory stands as a powerful repudiation of imperial arrogance. It remains one of the few African nations to have resisted colonization successfully and emerged with its sovereignty intact. The Second Italo-Ethiopian War is not merely a chapter of tragedy but one of enduring resistance, identity, and international significance.

The Second Italo-Ethiopian War remains one of the 20th century’s most illuminating conflicts. It laid bare the hypocrisy of colonial rhetoric, the weakness of international diplomacy, and the devastating reach of fascist violence. It demonstrated that even in the face of overwhelming technological superiority, the human spirit could not be so easily conquered.

Ethiopia’s resistance reverberated far beyond its borders. It galvanized Pan-African movements, challenged European notions of supremacy, and offered proof that colonialism was neither inevitable nor irreversible. In the ruins of Addis Ababa and the highlands of Tigray, a new world was being born, one that would eventually bring down the imperial order across the globe.

In the age of global alliances, humanitarian norms, and institutional diplomacy, the Second Italo-Ethiopian War serves as both a warning and a testament. It is a warning of what happens when ambition overrides law and ideology eclipses humanity. And it is a testament to a nation that refused to kneel, endured occupation, and reclaimed its sovereignty not just through war, but through moral fortitude and historic resolve.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Beyond the Code: The Enigma of Alan Turing

The history of modern science and technology is populated by many brilliant minds, but few have left as indelible a mark on human progress a...